05-04-2015, 04:06 AM
Better. But still need some fine tuning.
The unit cost still seems too high and the research cost not high enough.
They don't give extra revs any more which is good but they don't really loose enough either. Most of the designs I played with lost between 3-6 RPM where as most real life examples I can find loose hundreds if not thousands, especially in more economy focused designs.
The gains for the power focused turbo's seems about right though power (not torque) could be dialed back a little.
The power gains for fuel efficient turbos seems right too but the torque gain for them is way short of the mark.
Both of these come back to them not loosing enough peek RPM I think.
This is actually where my other suggestion about giving all options all stats. I think a lot of the turbo's problems would be fixed by them getting the RPM stat.
The unit cost still seems too high and the research cost not high enough.
They don't give extra revs any more which is good but they don't really loose enough either. Most of the designs I played with lost between 3-6 RPM where as most real life examples I can find loose hundreds if not thousands, especially in more economy focused designs.
The gains for the power focused turbo's seems about right though power (not torque) could be dialed back a little.
The power gains for fuel efficient turbos seems right too but the torque gain for them is way short of the mark.
Both of these come back to them not loosing enough peek RPM I think.
This is actually where my other suggestion about giving all options all stats. I think a lot of the turbo's problems would be fixed by them getting the RPM stat.