Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
[FIXED]Fuel Milage seems high.
#3
(03-01-2014, 04:50 AM)Frankschtaldt Wrote: Other issues I see with this image:
1 - 3323rpm seems a tad unrealistic for a 131mm stroke in a 1905 engine. Especially for a single cylinder engine that would be fighting with a massive flywheel to maintain momentum between firing cycles.
2 - power is still displaying in hp and ps (wasn't this going to be changed to hp and kW? I may have jumped the gun, sorry if I have)
3 - The ratings look still to be broken. 7,8,8/100 shouldn't equal 28/100 overall.
Some of these, especially the RPM, might deserve their own new thread.

On the overall rating, i really dont know what to think about it.
It depends on how its calculated and what its supposed to mean. i.e. Relative to other cars? an average of stats(your assumption i think)? a measure of the vehicle in the historical period?
Thats also a bit of a complex subject i suppose :S
Reply


Messages In This Thread
[FIXED]Fuel Milage seems high. - by Sarchez - 03-01-2014, 04:39 AM
RE: Fuel Milage seems high. - by Frankschtaldt - 03-01-2014, 04:50 AM
RE: Fuel Milage seems high. - by Arakash - 03-01-2014, 04:55 AM
RE: Fuel Milage seems high. - by Frankschtaldt - 03-01-2014, 05:08 AM
RE: Fuel Milage seems high. - by Eric.B - 05-24-2014, 09:59 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)