03-01-2014, 04:55 AM
(03-01-2014, 04:50 AM)Frankschtaldt Wrote: Other issues I see with this image:Some of these, especially the RPM, might deserve their own new thread.
1 - 3323rpm seems a tad unrealistic for a 131mm stroke in a 1905 engine. Especially for a single cylinder engine that would be fighting with a massive flywheel to maintain momentum between firing cycles.
2 - power is still displaying in hp and ps (wasn't this going to be changed to hp and kW? I may have jumped the gun, sorry if I have)
3 - The ratings look still to be broken. 7,8,8/100 shouldn't equal 28/100 overall.
On the overall rating, i really dont know what to think about it.
It depends on how its calculated and what its supposed to mean. i.e. Relative to other cars? an average of stats(your assumption i think)? a measure of the vehicle in the historical period?
Thats also a bit of a complex subject i suppose :S